Capital Blue Cross President and CEO James Mead, a statement of support for Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell chose the proposed health insurance tax reserve to help relieve the health status of art to the responsibility of errors crisis.
“The medico-abuse crisis in Pennsylvania is true, and we welcome Dir-Ed Rendell chooses to act with determination, resolve” Mead. “We care deeply about health care for our patients and ourselves deeply on almost 7000 physicians and nearly 50 hospitals in our region of Pennsylvania, process. We know, as a problem threatening, is for health care providers. And we are ready to help. ”
Mead continued: “But we have serious problems and concerns of this proposal to pay a levy of a new, almost one quarter of a billion dollars of tax reserves clients of health insurance, including Such non-profit health insurance as Capital Blue Cross. We and our customers and members is not the cause of this crisis or contributions in this regard. indeed, we too, they are already paid by increasing the capacity of services, “defensive medicine” and recently in our network of physician contract. But this proposal requires our members to pay more, and he needs our sector contributes only the entire cost of this solution Provisional. This is not fair. And it is a bad law and order, for reasons I’ll explain.
“We are disappointed that the former have learned to this tax proposal of our members, after finding it had already announced, and without the slightest opportunity to comment on how it perhaps 800000 impact on our customers and our employees over 2000, “says Mead.
“First, it is important to understand what we are talking about. Our surplus funds for the protection of our customers. Assurances are required by state law surpluses, and with reason. That we can make sure that we pay our customers, says that given the events of catastrophic events, they are likely financial events, or another disaster. The law contains very few requests surplus, but stable insurance companies put in land fallow must be more than the minimum coverage. In fact, for us maintaining our national network and use the Blue Cross mark, we must exceed these amounts several times around. And this is a good thing we do. Over the past two years, Pennsylvania, at least two major insurance companies, businesses, which once had much above the minimum surpluses, but failed, and should be declared insolvent by the state, costs Pennsylvanians finally million. Ironically, is one of those companies was a large medical assistance found insurer.
“It is also important to remember that the capital of Blue Cross, and all” Blue “plans - are non-profit. Our reservations or undistributed surplus to shareholders. They are not required, such as profits or as dividends to investors on Wall Street. However, they are a savings account in reserve for our members. They are used primarily as a safety net to ensure that our members, good, bad weather or catastrophe, their health care systems must be paid and available.
“Secondly, these means of generating income from savings-efficiency, which will help us to limit the growth of our premiums, Mead.” Everyone knows, health care premiums have been way up, without our surpluses, they are even more. It is an indisputable fact. Capital Blue Cross, we do not have a dimethanonaphthalerne Premium revenue reserves of more than seven years. On the contrary, we take the savings income and the largest reserves of the end bonuses to limit growth.
“This proposal would reduce considerably our ability to these two important public policy objectives. In other words, there would be less security of our members and contribute to an increase in premiums. And this is not right for them. You have nothing to do, these crisis. ”
Mead said: “We are also concerned by the proposal on the use of this crisis, a graduate of a tax rate in Pennsylvania. PA has withstood the pride is a graduate of taxation, and with reason - and logic s applies also pointed. Capital companies such as Blue Cross have strong surpluses, because we have our conservative societies. We are proud of this fact. Ironically, in this proposal, we would be punished for the precautionary principle. We pay a higher tax rate than if we now have our reservations spending liberal. This is exactly the opposite of the good law and order. insurance companies to maintain their spending, and put money in the reserves of its members Must be supported, not to be punished.
“In addition, a health insurance fund regional, we are concerned about regional inequalities, which seem to exist in this proposal. We believe that the proven medical crisis is a federal state problem, for which a national solution - and we are ready, just do our share as Pennsylvanians. But this proposal seems not to be fair. We tried to run preliminary calculations to pay this tax, which the limited amount of information available to us in the press release. In other words, companies like ours Conservative pay most of the tax burden, both in terms of actual dollars and as a percentage of our reserves. A large proportion of this clearly disproportionate tax would come from our members in this region, but only a relatively small share of revenue from this tax would benefit doctors and hospitals, our members in this region. Blue Cross Capital is one of the smallest Blue plans in Pennsylvania, but our members to pay would be one of the largest shares of this new tax.